The number of people on earth

The number of people on this planet is a pretty mindboggling number if on stops to think about it. Here is a world population clock: http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html

Exponential growth is crazy, especially over a span of centuries. It seems like only yesterday (1999) when there were only 6 billion people on the planet. The world hit 5 billion people in 1987.  Being that there are 6.7 billion people now, the human population on earth has grown roughly 12% in the past decade.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population

6.7 billion is a pretty big number. My pet comparison has been the amount of gold on the planet per person. The total amount of gold produced (in ~1997) is roughly 3.4 billion troy ounces, which in a sensible unit of measurement is 3.7 billion ounces. There is thus less than one ounce of mined gold per living person, which in my mind is good enough reason to not have a gold standard.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/prospect1/goldgip.html

Gold production is roughly 80 million ounces per year, which is also roughly the current number of additional people born per year (i.e. births minus deaths). That is a lot of people. Over twice as many people as live in California, every year. Enough people are born in 4 years to comprise the entire current population of the United States. Kind of crazy to think about, especially because that entire population will be shitting their pants.

http://www.goldsheetlinks.com/production.htm

http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/img/worldpch.gif

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html

The big 7 billion is coming in 2011.

A corollary to this is that a lot of people die each year. Overall mortality is around 1%, meaning around 60 million people die every year. So much death…

http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/476831.html

Things on my mind

  • Fall quarter’s over. Wooooo, winter break! I think I came short of dominating my classes, which makes me a little sad. But that’s life: a little sad. And short of dominating my classes.
  • I’m feeling a bit of regret about blowing all my cash. Hopefully the feeling goes away soon.
  • Stanford women’s volleyball is dominating much unlike my fantasy basketball team. Two rounds done in the tourney so far. Will they make it to the finals and win this year?
  • My fantasy basketball team is terrible with a capital ‘T’. It’s Terrible. And also pretty much unfixable.
  • I should figure out something to do during break. Aside from a vacation, I have no plans for much of it.
  • I rediscovered Sigur Ros this past week. Their music is pretty sweet.
  • It’s really bugging me that I can’t figure out which Victoria’s Secret catalog(s) Famke Janssen’s in. What good is the internets if such a query is so hard to find?

News becomes slim between album releases

The Nobel Peace Prize Concert on 11 December, 2008 will feature our favorite musician.

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/concert/

Also, here is an English-language review of The Chase. I’m not sure how anyone comes up with this type of language. I also kind of resent anyone calling Marit a “Scandinavian Taylor Swift.” In my opinion, Swift still has miles to go before she can rival Ms. Larsen.

Nordic roots pop starling Marit Larsen scored her second Norwegian number one with “If a Song Could Get Me You,” the utterly charming lead single from her sophomore outing The Chase (which itself debuted atop her country’s album chart.) In a typically starry-eyed twist on the song-about-a-song concept, the tune finds Larsen proposing to write a song in whatever style it will take to win her beloved’s affections: “I could try with a waltz/I could try rock and roll/I could try with the blues.” There’s no doubt that she’s capable but, as it turns out, she doesn’t spend much time with those styles on The Chase (though “Steal My Heart” and “I’ve Heard Your Love Songs” are both waltzes, and lovely ones too; respectively dainty and sumptuous). Conspicuously absent from that list are pop and country, the two genres that most closely encapsulate her general musical approach. Larsen began her professional career as one half of the teen pop act M2M, and she hasn’t strayed too far from that group’s trendsetting brand of earnest, accessible bubble-folk — growing into her twenties may have helped her develop a satisfying emotional complexity to accompany her penchant for pop melodicism, but her intrinsic sweetness remains resoundingly undimmed. Meanwhile, her lavish sentimentality, narrative lyrical bent, and colorful instrumental choices (mandolin, banjo, harmonica, and dobro, along with more Baroque, orchestral touches) suggest a link with country that was evident on her solo debut and is even more pronounced here (sometime between the two albums, Larsen started a low-profile sideline stint playing in the Oslo-based traditionalist bluegrass band Elwood Caine.) Of course, there’s not necessarily much of a gap between classicist songwriter pop and country music in its chart-friendly contemporary incarnation. It doesn’t feel like a stretch, for instance, to describe Larsen as a Scandinavian Taylor Swift, considering that her differences from the rising country star have more to do with geography and vocal inflection than anything musically substantial (though she has a not-insignificant seven years on Swift, experience-wise.) Much like Swift‘s own sophomore album, which was released around the same time, The Chase is an expertly crafted musical statement that balances rootsiness and polish, leavens its maturity and poise with undeniable flashes of youthful brio, and displays considerable mainstream appeal regardless of genre classifications. Indeed, it exudes confidence, not just musical and writerly, but — this album’s most striking difference from its predecessor — emotional as well, as Larsen chides an indecisive new lover (“Is It Love?”), announces her plans to walk out on a sleeping, unwitting partner (“Ten Steps,” whose sanguine empowerment marks a complete reversal from the crippling paranoia of the debut’s “This Time Tomorrow”), and reflects calmly on the existential strangeness and unsettling simplicity of post-breakup life (“This Is Me, This Is You”), all with an assertiveness and aplomb worlds away from the passivity and hesitance that permeated Under the Surface. Even as it deals with some difficult situations, then, The Chase is far from a downer; and when things are working out in Larsen’s favor — as on the light-hearted title track and preposterously giddy new love ode “Addicted” — it’s absolutely effervescent.

(K. Ross Hoffman, allmusic.com)

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dcfixzrkldae

Review of Under the Surface from same person:

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:jcfixqudldfe~T1