Discontinuity

Recently I’ve been wondering if it was a bad idea to give up on the violin, and if it’s any use to try to take it up again. It’s an odd relationship, violin and me. I take it out of its case maybe once every 6 months, but have kept it with me during every move. It’s sat underneath my bed in so many houses, dorms, apartments. I keep waiting for that divine inspiration to hit, when I will fall in love again and believe that I can play again. It’s been 10 years since Tchaikovsky Violin Concerto, and I don’t think it’s coming back.

I should be blaming myself. In retrospect, I don’t think I set my goals high enough. Same with getting into Stanford. Accomplishing things is the worst thing that happens to me because of the emptiness that follows. Nowadays, I’m not even sure I have such life goals anymore. But I still feel that calling every now and again. Its name is regret. Whenever one of the teachers uses a piano transcription of the first movement for the plie combination, I get chills down my spine. It’s about as distracting as professional-ballerina-who-wore-a-leotard-that-was-a-little-too-thin-and-transparent-when-she-sweated-and-I-don’t-think-she-was-wearing-a-bra (Show some modesty! Or don’t. Either way works for me.). That melody gets me every time. So beautiful *sob*.

It’s so sad how many activities fall by the wayside during college, or after we start working. The assistant master wrote on my block of wood (literally, a 2×4 piece of wood that we had to punch and chop; those were the days) “Never stop TKD.” Which, of course, I did shortly after freshman year. And then when I tried to pick it up again during grad school, it didn’t stick. And of course I am now “so busy with work” that I don’t have the energy to go back and reconcile with my past self. It gets harder and harder to go home again. And I really don’t see any way of going back now that that hussy ballet has come into my life.

Which is really interesting, because I was recently admiring just how much continuity matters in perfecting an art form (or really anything). Those girls in Cardinal Ballet are really something. It takes such a damn long time to get good at something, a huge amount of dedication to stick it through the rough spots to get to the point where you get good enough to enjoy doing what you do. Each year of sticking with it, each moment closer to the 10,000 hours brings a little bit more depth, a little more maturity, a little closer to perfection. It’s so hard to see in the grind, when the temptations of all the rest of life are there to seduce us away. I feel like I failed. And it breaks my heart knowing how many of these WB girls will give it up once they graduate high school.

Nowadays, when we give up on something that we’ve been doing, it feels like a great loss. Although when we’re young, I don’t think we thought of things that way. New opportunities seemed like new adventures, additional conquests that we could surmount. Although at the end of the day, maybe we realize that so many of those things seem shallow. We can spend our entire lives jumping from obsession to obsession, but what joy does that accumulate for us? Yes, at one point I was pretty damn good at DDR, but now none of my friends play it anymore, and neither do I.

One of my friends has said that TKD is for teenagers, and that ballet is for 13 year old girls, because physically that is the when one is most capable of performing in either, and it slowly goes downhill from there. Having seen septuagenarians in ballet class, elegant as ever, and guys old enough to be my father in TKD who can kick my ass, I have to disagree somewhat. It becomes love of the game that compels us to continue the more our natural talents erode.  I think our bond with the art becomes greater the more difficult it becomes. The struggles define who we are more so than the cupcakes handed us.

?But what makes something worth doing? At my most cynical (i.e. most of the time), everything is equally futile. It’s not like we will ever reach that pinnacle of perfection that inhabits our dreams. Activities just fill up time, and ennui is our enemy. And for those who know me, they know that I don’t subscribe to the pleasure principle. It is not enough for something to make one happy to make it worthwhile. I sometimes try to convince myself that all this effort is building up to something. If it is, I hope I never achieve it.

At some point in our lives, it becomes evident that we can’t do everything that we want to do. It’s that point when possibilities must necessarily collapse, and also when we truly feel our own mortality. Somewhere in the drafts folder of this blog is a very messy post about Never Let Me Go (which, incidentally, is what I thought was the best film of last year (whereby “best” I mainly mean “most depressing”)) which I haven’t the heart to complete. I think one of the most poignant thoughts that lingers with me about the film and book is that our lives are finite, no matter how long we actually live or what our life expectancy is. It doesn’t matter how long, we will always feel the impetus of death. No matter if we live twenty or twenty thousand years, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference; we would still have regret. In my own twisted logic, I actually think they were better off, knowing what fate has in store. But the truth is that their lives are identical to ours. Only the details are different.

Only the unimaginative will have their lives turn out the way they planned. But it doesn’t hurt to be a sometimes dreamer. I guess what I want to say to the musicians is to never stop playing; to the dancers, to never stop dancing.

BSJ Swan Lake

Despite having a groupon ticket, I was tempted to not go to Ballet San Jose’s Swan Lake last night. But upon learning that Carlos Acosta from the Royal Ballet was guesting, I guess I had to go.

Carlos Acosta was stellar, very classically clean. His age expectedly shows in the big jumps, but he still executed them cleanly; his turning ability is still tops, with superhuman control. His stage presence was extreme, and he exuded an air of confidence. The problem, I think, was that his Siegfried was somewhat mismatched with Alexsandra Meijer’s Odette/Odile, though. It’s at least partially due to the choreography, which I think is more overt and the least subtle of any productions I’ve seen (intentional, I believe, to facilitate viewing by new audience members). Her acting in both roles seemed a little too Hollywood, a bit over the top, especially compared to Acosta’s demure, understated performance.

Some other unique things about the performance, which I’m not sure contributed much: having Baron Von Rothbart as a dancing role was a little odd. It wasn’t very obvious to me what benefit there is to this, except to showcase another male dancer. Same with the Court Jester role, which was done admirably by Akira Takahashi. (Nahat’s Romeo and Juliet also had a jester role; luckily, I don’t recall his Giselle having one. But it shouldn’t really become a thing in ballets.) Adding elements of humor helped a little with the length of the ballet, but I really think Swan Lake should be capped at 2.5 hours. On the other hand, it was interesting (although not supremely exciting) to see a full-on Act 4. Someone should tell Dennis Nahat that a 3 hour ballet is too long. I understand that, with their relatively short season, it makes sense to have longer shows to showcase more dancers, but at 3 hours, it becomes mentally taxing to follow.

I feel like Meijer is in a strange stage artistically. She’s around 28 years old, near the top of her technical ability, but something seems missing from her artistically. Or maybe I’m just comparing her to Sarah Van Patten, who has artistic maturity far beyond her age. AM’s Odile was actually enjoyable to watch, but she had some missteps during her fouettes; she started out solidly, including some doubles in the mix, but there was a small imbalance that resulted in her falling off pointe near the end. I think her insistence of sticking with doubles was partly to blame, and her ending was also forced. (I guess SVP also didn’t have the cleanest of fouettes when I saw her last year.) The rest of AM’s black swan pdd was solid, and I liked certain nuances, but it probably doesn’t rank among the best ever.

Her white swan was good as well. The nits: do her feet wing? It might’ve just been my viewing angle, but her line seems broken at the feet during arabesque penchees. On the other hand, she has freakishly long legs and arms, so her lines are already ridiculous. Another thing I noticed is just how fast she does partnered pirouettes. I think this is because she’s crazy thin (even for a ballerina) and thus has little angular inertia or something, but it did seem like some Odette turns seemed a bit fast and lacked the languid quality of other Odettes. Same with her serres, which were impressively fast from the 8th row, but I doubt the back of the orchestra saw them.

The audience was very warm and enthusiastic. A solid performance overall, just wish it were a little shorter.

Things on my mind

  • Sunday has become a very lazy resting day post Saturday rehearsals. Now, not only do my legs and feet cramp at night, but my shoulder is hurting, too. Why is Don Q so quick? Afternoon naps are kind of nice, though.
  • Saw Ballet San Jose’s Swan Lake last night. Will probably write something about it soon.
  • Went to see Stanford Dance’s The Body and What It Carries, which I thought was an interesting program. Two short thoughts. I feel like modern ballet is always trying to rediscover modern dance, but is less successful and less compelling to watch; I enjoyed the modern pieces a bit more. I think there is some happy medium somewhere, but it’s probably closer to the confines of classical vocabulary than some choreographers would like. Second, just how different it is between WB’s high school and Stanford’s undergrad dancers. A few years doesn’t seem so much these days, but different phases of life and maturity really show. I guess even most undergrads are in a different life stage than us. Growing old kind of sucks. May write a post about this at some point, too.
  • My reading queue is clogging up with Annotated Alice, Annotated HC Andersen, and Superfreakonomics. Will I ever get back to the Rabbit tetralogy?
  • Will I be able to go to Reno/Tahoe next weekend, or will it be all crazy weather? Also, not sure when I’ll be able to make it to SFB’s program 3 at this point…